← All workflows

Class Certification Motion

Draft Class Certification Motions in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

14 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

  • Complaint & Pleadings
  • Discovery Materials
  • Expert Reports

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's Class Certification Motion skill transforms your case file into a comprehensive, court-ready FRCP Rule 23 motion. It systematically analyzes your pleadings, discovery materials, expert reports, and deposition transcripts to build rigorous arguments for every certification requirement. The result is a polished, evidence-grounded motion structured for judicial scrutiny and ready for attorney review.

Drafting a class certification motion is one of the most labor-intensive tasks in complex litigation. Attorneys must synthesize voluminous discovery, expert analyses, and deposition testimony into a cohesive brief that satisfies every Rule 23 requirement while preempting defense attacks. This process typically consumes dozens of attorney hours and carries significant risk of overlooking critical evidence or certification factors.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of class certification briefing by ingesting your entire case file and systematically mapping evidence to each Rule 23 requirement. The AI produces a structured, court-ready motion with precise class definitions, factor-by-factor analysis, and preemptive defense rebuttals—all grounded in your actual record. What once took days of attorney time now takes minutes, with comprehensive coverage that reduces the risk of gaps.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your pleadings, discovery materials, expert reports, and deposition transcripts

  2. 2. AI analyzes the record to identify common issues, class scope, and certification factors

  3. 3. Review the fully structured Rule 23 motion with evidence-grounded arguments

  4. 4. Export the polished motion in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Introduction & Proposed Class Definition

  • Rule 23(a) Prerequisites Analysis

  • Rule 23(b) Certification Arguments

  • Preemptive Defense Rebuttals

  • Notice & Administration Plan

  • Proposed Case Management Approach

What it handles

  • Structured Rule 23(a) analysis covering numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy

  • Rule 23(b) subsection briefing with predominance and superiority arguments

  • Precise class definition drafting tied to liability theory and objective criteria

  • Preemptive rebuttal of anticipated defense arguments with record citations

  • Notice and administration plan with case management recommendations

  • Evidence-grounded arguments drawn directly from uploaded case materials

Required documents

  • Complaint & Pleadings

    Original complaint, amended complaints, answers, and any related pleadings establishing the claims and defenses

    .pdf, .docx

  • Discovery Materials

    Interrogatory responses, document productions, requests for admission, and defendant business records showing scope of conduct

    .pdf, .docx

  • Expert Reports

    Damages models, class-wide proof methodology reports, and statistical analyses supporting certification

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Deposition Transcripts

    Transcripts of named plaintiff depositions, corporate designee testimony, and key witness examinations

    .pdf, .docx

  • Named Plaintiff Declarations

    Declarations from named plaintiffs addressing representative role, understanding of duties, and absence of conflicts

    .pdf, .docx

  • Class Counsel Qualifications

    Attorney CVs, firm resumes, and documentation of prior class action experience and available resources

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce drafting time from days to minutes on one of the most complex motions in civil litigation

Ensure no certification factor is overlooked with systematic Rule 23(a) and 23(b) coverage

Strengthen your motion with AI-identified record evidence mapped to each legal requirement

Proactively address defense challenges with preemptive rebuttals grounded in your case materials

Questions

What Rule 23 requirements does this motion address?

CaseMark drafts comprehensive arguments for all Rule 23(a) prerequisites—numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy—as well as the applicable Rule 23(b) subsection, including predominance and superiority analysis under 23(b)(3). The output is structured for rigorous judicial scrutiny.

Does this work for state-court class certification motions?

Yes. While the default framework follows FRCP 23, CaseMark adapts the analysis to state equivalents when your materials indicate state-court proceedings. You can specify the applicable state rule and the AI will adjust the legal standards accordingly.

How does CaseMark handle the class definition?

CaseMark drafts a precise, administrable class definition tied to your liability theory using objective criteria. It incorporates temporal and geographic scope from your case materials and ensures the definition avoids individualized membership inquiries.

Will the motion address anticipated defense arguments?

Absolutely. CaseMark proactively identifies and rebuts common defense challenges—such as manageability concerns, individualized issues, and adequacy attacks—using specific citations to your uploaded record evidence.

What documents do I need to upload for the best results?

For optimal output, upload your complaint and amended pleadings, discovery materials (interrogatories, document productions, RFAs), expert reports with damages models, deposition transcripts of named plaintiffs and key witnesses, and named plaintiff declarations. CaseMark works with whatever subset you have available but produces the strongest motion with a complete record.

Can I customize the motion after it's generated?

Yes. CaseMark generates a fully editable draft that you can review, revise, and refine before filing. The structured output makes it easy to strengthen specific sections or add additional case-specific arguments.

Related