Contact
← All workflows

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Drop your documents and we'll handle the rest. Results delivered to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

Want saved work, higher file limits, and a fuller workspace? Open the full CaseMark app instead.

Start here

Upload documents

The upload area is live as soon as your email is in place. Drag files in or browse from your device.

Workflow

30b6 Corporate Rep

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run workflow

Overview

CaseMark's 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition skill automates the most labor-intensive aspects of corporate deposition practice — from drafting precisely scoped notice topics to building examination outlines and preserving binding admissions. Whether you're taking or defending the deposition, the AI delivers structured, jurisdiction-aware work product that keeps your case strategy on track.

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions are among the most strategically consequential — and most time-consuming — events in litigation. Drafting topics with reasonable particularity, selecting and preparing the right designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, and tracking binding admissions across sprawling corporate testimony requires dozens of attorney hours and meticulous coordination across teams.

CaseMark transforms 30(b)(6) deposition workflows by applying AI to every phase — taking, defending, and post-deposition analysis. Upload your case documents and notice, and CaseMark delivers precisely scoped topics, tailored exam outlines, designee prep playbooks, objection maps, and admission summaries, all structured for immediate use and export.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your pleadings, 30(b)(6) notice, and supporting case documents

  2. 2. AI analyzes your role (taking or defending) and generates tailored workflows

  3. 3. Review drafted topics, exam outlines, designee assignments, and objection maps

  4. 4. Export polished work product in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Mode Selection & Role Analysis

  • Drafted Notice Topics with Particularity Assessment

  • Topic Response Matrix & Designee Assignment

  • Examination Outline with Admission Scripts

  • Objection Map & Privilege Dispute Triage

  • Designee Preparation Playbook

  • Post-Deposition Admission Summary & Contradiction Log

What it handles

  • Draft 30(b)(6) notice topics with reasonable particularity and bounded scope

  • Build topic-by-topic examination outlines tied to claims and defenses

  • Generate designee assignment matrices and preparation playbooks

  • Map objections, privilege issues, and scope disputes for each topic

  • Extract and preserve binding corporate admissions for summary judgment or trial

  • Produce post-deposition contradiction logs and follow-up action items

Required documents

  • Pleadings

    Complaint, answer, and any amended pleadings establishing claims and defenses

    .pdf, .docx

  • 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice

    The served or draft Rule 30(b)(6) notice with listed topics

    .pdf, .docx

  • Key Case Documents

    Relevant correspondence, contracts, policies, or exhibits referenced in the notice or pleadings

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Organizational Chart

    Corporate org chart identifying potential designees and custodians

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Privilege Log

    Existing privilege log to flag protected topics and communications

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Prior Deposition Transcripts

    Transcripts from related depositions for contradiction analysis and follow-up planning

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

  • Protective Orders or Local Rules

    Any applicable protective orders, stipulations, or local rules governing the deposition

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce hours of manual topic drafting and outline preparation to minutes with AI-generated, particularity-compliant notice topics and examination scripts

Defend designees more effectively with automated topic response matrices, witness assignment recommendations, and comprehensive preparation playbooks

Preserve critical corporate admissions by systematically extracting and cataloging binding testimony for use at summary judgment or trial

Minimize scope disputes and objection risks with built-in overbreadth analysis, privilege flagging, and meet-and-confer guidance

Questions

Can CaseMark handle both taking and defending 30(b)(6) depositions?

Yes. CaseMark supports three distinct modes: Taking (drafting topics, exam outlines, and admission scripts), Defending (topic response matrices, designee assignments, and prep playbooks), and Post-Deposition (admission summaries, contradiction logs, and follow-up actions). Simply indicate your role and the AI tailors its output accordingly.

How does the AI ensure notice topics meet the reasonable particularity standard?

CaseMark applies FRCP 30(b)(6) requirements to each drafted topic, ensuring specificity of conduct, bounded date ranges, identified participants, and relevant document classes. The AI flags overly broad or conclusory language and ties each topic to pleaded elements or affirmative defenses.

Can I use this for state-court corporate representative depositions?

Absolutely. While CaseMark defaults to FRCP 30(b)(6), it also supports state analogs such as California CCP § 2025.230 and similar rules. You can specify your jurisdiction and any applicable local rules so the output conforms to the correct procedural framework.

How does CaseMark help preserve corporate admissions for summary judgment?

CaseMark generates admission scripts during examination planning and, in post-deposition mode, extracts binding corporate admissions from transcripts. It cross-references testimony against pleadings and exhibits to identify contradictions and lock in statements usable at summary judgment or trial.

What types of documents should I upload for the best results?

For optimal output, upload the complaint and answer, the 30(b)(6) notice (or your draft topics), relevant correspondence, organizational charts, privilege logs, and key exhibits. CaseMark uses these to map corporate knowledge, identify the right designees, and build targeted examination outlines.

Does CaseMark help with objections and scope disputes?

Yes. CaseMark generates a comprehensive objection map for each noticed topic, flagging overbreadth, privilege concerns, undue burden, and relevance issues. It also provides meet-and-confer talking points and suggested narrowing language to help resolve scope disputes efficiently.

Related