← All workflows

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with Para

Explore this workflow

Get started with Para

Para is an AI colleague for legal teams. Send it this work by email, Teams or Slack, and it hands back the finished document.

12 minutes with Para

What you'll need

  • Pleadings
  • 30(b)(6) Notice or Draft Topics

Plans from $20 a month, with usage included.

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's 30(b)(6) Corporate Representative Deposition skill automates the most labor-intensive aspects of corporate deposition practice — from drafting precisely scoped notice topics to building examination outlines, preparing designees, and extracting binding admissions. Whether you are taking or defending a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, this AI-powered workflow delivers comprehensive, case-specific work product in a fraction of the time.

Rule 30(b)(6) depositions are among the most strategically complex and time-consuming tasks in litigation. Drafting notice topics that satisfy reasonable particularity, preparing designees across multiple corporate knowledge areas, mapping objections, and extracting usable admissions from transcripts can consume dozens of attorney hours — with costly mistakes if scope is too broad, preparation is incomplete, or key admissions are missed.

CaseMark transforms 30(b)(6) deposition workflows by applying AI to every phase — drafting, defending, and post-deposition analysis. The platform enforces procedural standards, ties every topic and question to your case theory, and produces organized, export-ready work product that strengthens your litigation position while dramatically reducing preparation time.

How to hand this to Para

  1. 1. Send Para the files

    Email them, drop them in a Teams or Slack message, or upload them.

  2. 2. Para runs the 30b6 Corporate Rep skill

    It works from your files and checks its citations against the record.

  3. 3. The finished document comes back

    Para returns it where you asked, usually as a DOCX, and offers the next step.

Example request · email, Teams or Slack
Para, run the 30b6 Corporate Rep skill for the Garcia matter. I've attached the Pleadings and 30(b)(6) Notice or Draft Topics. Send the finished draft back here as a DOCX.

What Para does

  1. 1. Upload your pleadings, 30(b)(6) notice, and supporting case documents
  2. 2. Select your role — taking, defending, or post-deposition analysis
  3. 3. AI drafts notice topics, exam outlines, designee assignments, and objection maps tailored to your case theory
  4. 4. Review, refine, and export your complete deposition workflow package (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Topic List with Reasonable Particularity Analysis

  • Examination Outline (Topic-by-Topic)

  • Designee Assignment & Preparation Playbook

  • Objection Map & Privilege Preservation Log

  • Binding Admission Summary & Contradiction Log

  • Follow-Up Action Items & Errata Tracker

What it handles

  • Draft 30(b)(6) notice topics with reasonable particularity and bounded scope

  • Build topic-by-topic examination outlines tied to claims and defenses

  • Generate designee assignment matrices and preparation playbooks for defending parties

  • Map objections and preserve privilege positions across every noticed topic

  • Extract and organize binding corporate admissions for summary judgment or trial

  • Produce post-deposition contradiction logs and follow-up action items

Required documents

  • Pleadings

    Complaint, answer, and counterclaims establishing the claims and defenses at issue

    .pdf, .docx

  • 30(b)(6) Notice or Draft Topics

    The served deposition notice with topic list, or your draft topics for review and refinement

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Organizational Chart

    Corporate org chart identifying potential designees and custodians

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Privilege Log

    Existing privilege log to inform objection mapping and scope analysis

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Deposition Transcripts

    Prior deposition transcripts for post-deposition admission extraction and contradiction analysis

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

  • Key Correspondence

    Relevant meet-and-confer letters, discovery correspondence, or protective orders

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce hours of manual topic drafting and outline preparation to minutes with AI that enforces reasonable particularity standards automatically

Strengthen your deposition strategy with examination scripts tied directly to your claims, defenses, and desired admissions

Defend corporate designees more effectively with structured preparation playbooks and pre-mapped objection strategies

Accelerate post-deposition work by instantly extracting binding admissions and contradictions ready for summary judgment or trial

Questions

Can CaseMark handle both taking and defending 30(b)(6) depositions?

Yes. CaseMark supports three distinct modes: Taking (drafting topics and exam outlines), Defending (designee assignment and preparation playbooks), and Post-Deposition (admission extraction and contradiction logging). Simply select your role and the AI tailors every output accordingly.

How does the AI ensure notice topics meet the reasonable particularity standard?

CaseMark analyzes each topic against the reasonable particularity requirements of FRCP 30(b)(6), ensuring topics include specific conduct or events, bounded time ranges, identified participants, and relevant document classes. It flags overly broad or conclusory language before you finalize.

Can I use this for state-court corporate representative depositions?

Absolutely. While CaseMark defaults to FRCP 30(b)(6), it also supports state analogs such as California CCP § 2025.230 and similar rules. You can specify your governing jurisdiction and the AI will adapt its analysis and drafting to the applicable procedural framework.

How does CaseMark help preserve binding admissions for summary judgment?

CaseMark's post-deposition mode extracts corporate admissions from transcripts, organizes them by topic, and flags contradictions against prior testimony or documents. This gives you a ready-made evidentiary foundation for summary judgment motions or trial impeachment.

What types of documents should I upload for the best results?

For optimal output, upload the complaint and answer, the 30(b)(6) notice (or your draft topics), relevant correspondence, organizational charts, and any existing privilege logs. For post-deposition analysis, include the transcript and exhibits. CaseMark uses all available context to produce more precise and case-specific work product.

Does CaseMark generate objection strategies for scope and privilege disputes?

Yes. CaseMark produces a comprehensive objection map that identifies overbreadth, privilege, and relevance issues for each noticed topic. It also suggests meet-and-confer language and narrowing proposals to help resolve scope disputes before the deposition.

Related