Cert Petition

Draft Supreme Court Cert Petitions in Minutes, Not Hours

15 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

15 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

Lower Court Opinions and Orders
Record Materials and Key Pleadings
Conflicting Authorities

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's Cert Petition Drafter uses AI to generate fully structured Petitions for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The tool enforces compliance with Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33 while identifying the strongest grounds for discretionary review from your uploaded case materials. From jurisdictional verification to appendix assembly, every element of the petition is addressed in a single streamlined workflow.

Drafting a Petition for Writ of Certiorari is one of the most demanding tasks in appellate practice. Attorneys must master intricate Supreme Court rules governing document structure, jurisdictional prerequisites, and timeliness while simultaneously crafting persuasive arguments that satisfy Rule 10's narrow criteria for discretionary review. The manual process of analyzing circuit splits, assembling appendices, and ensuring compliance across Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33 consumes enormous time and carries significant risk of procedural error.

CaseMark automates the structural and analytical heavy lifting of cert petition drafting. By uploading your lower court opinions, record materials, and conflicting authorities, the AI identifies jurisdictional bases, calculates filing deadlines, maps Rule 10 grounds for review, and generates a fully ordered petition with all required sections. Attorneys can focus their expertise on refining the persuasive narrative rather than wrestling with formatting rules and compliance checklists.

How it works

1. Upload lower court opinions, record materials, and any conflicting authorities from other circuits
2. AI analyzes jurisdictional basis, calculates Rule 13 deadlines, and identifies Rule 10 grounds for review
3. Review the fully structured cert petition with questions presented, statement of the case, and persuasive arguments
4. Export in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF) ready for booklet formatting under Rule 33

What you get

Cover Page with Caption and Counsel Information
Questions Presented
Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement
Table of Contents and Table of Authorities
Constitutional and Statutory Provisions
Statement of the Case (Procedural History, Facts, Lower Court Reasoning)
Reasons for Granting the Writ (Rule 10 Analysis)
Appendix in Reverse Chronological Order

What it handles

Automatic Rule 14 document structure with all required sections in proper order
Rule 10 analysis identifying circuit splits, precedent conflicts, and important federal questions
Jurisdictional verification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1254 and 1257 with timeliness calculation
Questions Presented drafting in single-sentence, yes/no-answerable format
Vehicle suitability assessment for clean facts and absence of procedural barriers
Appendix assembly guidance in reverse chronological order with compliance checks

Required documents

Lower Court Opinions and Orders
All decisions from the court(s) below, including any rehearing orders or denial of rehearing
.pdf, .docx
Record Materials and Key Pleadings
Relevant pleadings, motions, and evidentiary materials from the lower court proceedings for appendix assembly
.pdf, .docx
Conflicting Authorities
Decisions from other circuits or state courts demonstrating a split on the legal question at issue
.pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

Governing Legal Provisions
Constitutional, statutory, or regulatory text central to the questions presented
.pdf, .docx
Procedural Timeline Summary
Summary of key dates including judgment date, rehearing denial, and any extension orders for Rule 13 deadline calculation
.pdf, .docx
Prior Cert Petitions or Amicus Briefs
Related cert petitions or amicus briefs on the same legal question for additional context
.pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce cert petition drafting time from days to hours with AI-powered document analysis and structured output

Ensure full compliance with Supreme Court Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33 through automated formatting and section ordering

Strengthen your petition with systematic identification of circuit splits, precedent conflicts, and important federal questions

Minimize risk of procedural defects with automatic jurisdictional verification and deadline calculation

Questions

How does CaseMark identify grounds for certiorari under Rule 10?

CaseMark analyzes your lower court opinions and conflicting authorities to identify circuit splits, conflicts with Supreme Court precedent, and important federal questions. The AI maps these findings directly to Rule 10's three recognized criteria for discretionary review.

Does the tool verify jurisdictional requirements and filing deadlines?

Yes. CaseMark automatically determines whether jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1254 (courts of appeals) or § 1257 (state courts of last resort) and calculates the 90-day filing deadline under Rule 13, accounting for any rehearing denial dates or extensions.

Will the petition follow the exact document order required by Rule 14?

Absolutely. CaseMark structures every section in the precise order mandated by Rule 14, from the cover page and questions presented through the statement of the case, reasons for granting the writ, and appendix.

Can CaseMark draft the Questions Presented in proper Supreme Court format?

Yes. CaseMark generates 1–3 questions presented in single-sentence format that frame the legal principle at issue and are answerable yes or no, following established Supreme Court conventions for effective cert petitions.

How does the tool handle circuit split arguments?

CaseMark cross-references the decisions you upload from different circuits or state courts, identifies the specific legal question on which they diverge, and constructs a structured split analysis showing how each court reached a conflicting conclusion.

Is the output ready for filing with the Supreme Court?

CaseMark produces a comprehensive draft that follows Rules 14 and 33 formatting requirements. You should review and refine the draft, verify all citations, and ensure final booklet formatting compliance before filing with the Clerk's office.