← All workflows

Consent Decree Epa

Draft EPA Consent Decrees in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Consent Decree Epa

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Consent Decree Epa

Overview

CaseMark's EPA Consent Decree skill automates the drafting of federal court consent decrees that resolve EPA civil enforcement actions under the CWA, CAA, RCRA, and CERCLA. It produces a comprehensive, DOJ-lodging-ready document covering everything from case caption and jurisdictional recitals through compliance obligations, civil penalties, stipulated penalties, dispute resolution, force majeure, covenants not to sue, and public comment requirements. The skill also addresses emerging enforcement priorities including PFAS contamination.

Drafting EPA consent decrees is one of the most complex tasks in environmental law. These documents must satisfy DOJ formatting and lodging requirements, accurately cite statutory authority across multiple environmental statutes, calculate penalties against inflation-adjusted maximums, and address dozens of interdependent provisions—from compliance schedules to force majeure to reopener clauses. A single omission or structural error can delay settlement by months and expose clients to continued enforcement risk.

CaseMark's AI analyzes your enforcement materials, defendant information, and technical data to generate a comprehensive consent decree draft structured for DOJ lodging and judicial entry. Every required section—jurisdictional recitals, compliance obligations, penalty provisions, stipulated penalties, dispute resolution, covenants not to sue, and public comment frameworks—is included and cross-referenced, giving your team a solid foundation to negotiate from rather than a blank page to fill.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload enforcement materials, defendant information, facility details, and penalty data

  2. 2. AI analyzes statutory authority, violation history, and regulatory requirements to structure the decree

  3. 3. Review and customize compliance obligations, penalty calculations, and settlement terms

  4. 4. Export the complete consent decree in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF) ready for DOJ lodging

What you get

  • Case Caption & Party Identification

  • Jurisdictional Recitals & Statutory Authority

  • Compliance Obligations & Implementation Schedule

  • Civil Penalty Provisions & Payment Terms

  • Stipulated Penalty Matrix

  • Dispute Resolution & Force Majeure Provisions

  • Covenants Not to Sue & Reservation of Rights

  • Public Comment Requirements & DOJ Lodging Framework

  • Emerging-Issue Considerations (PFAS)

  • Technical Appendices & Attachment References

What it handles

  • Complete case caption, jurisdictional recitals, and party identification with corporate verification

  • Compliance obligation schedules with milestone tracking and technical attachment integration

  • Civil penalty calculations referencing 40 CFR § 19.4 inflation-adjusted maximums and economic benefit analysis

  • Stipulated penalty matrices, dispute resolution procedures, and force majeure provisions

  • Covenants not to sue with reservation of rights and reopener clauses

  • Public comment compliance framework and emerging-issue coverage including PFAS releases

Required documents

  • Enforcement Materials

    Complaint or draft complaint, Notices of Violation, administrative orders, inspection reports, and sampling data underlying the enforcement action

    .pdf, .docx

  • Defendant & Facility Information

    Defendant legal name, incorporation details, principal place of business, parent/subsidiary relationships, facility address, operational history, and permit records

    .pdf, .docx

  • Penalty & Technical Data

    Economic benefit analysis, violation history, ability-to-pay documentation, and any technical attachments such as Scope of Work, Remedial Action Plan, or Compliance Implementation Plan

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

Supporting documents

  • Prior Settlement Agreements

    Any prior consent decrees, administrative consent orders, or settlement agreements with EPA or state agencies involving the same defendant or facility

    .pdf, .docx

  • Correspondence with DOJ/EPA

    Settlement negotiation correspondence, term sheets, or preliminary agreement outlines exchanged with DOJ or EPA counsel

    .pdf, .docx, .eml

  • Environmental Site Assessments

    Phase I or Phase II ESA reports relevant to CERCLA liability or innocent landowner defenses

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Dramatically reduce first-draft turnaround from weeks to minutes while maintaining the structural rigor required for federal court filings

Ensure comprehensive coverage of all required consent decree provisions, reducing the risk of omitted clauses or procedural deficiencies

Reference current penalty frameworks and inflation-adjusted maximums to support defensible settlement negotiations

Address cutting-edge enforcement issues including PFAS releases with up-to-date regulatory considerations

Questions

Which environmental statutes does this skill cover?

CaseMark's EPA Consent Decree skill covers enforcement actions under the Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and CERCLA (Superfund). It structures the decree's jurisdictional recitals and compliance obligations to match the specific statutory framework of your case.

Does the output include current penalty maximums?

Yes. CaseMark references 40 CFR § 19.4 inflation-adjusted penalty maximums and structures the civil penalty section with economic benefit analysis considerations. You should always verify current figures against the latest Federal Register updates before finalizing.

Can this handle multi-defendant or multi-facility settlements?

Absolutely. CaseMark identifies parent/subsidiary/successor relationships, addresses joint and several liability across multiple defendants, and can structure facility-specific compliance schedules for settlements involving multiple sites.

Does the decree address PFAS-related enforcement issues?

Yes. CaseMark includes emerging-issue considerations for PFAS releases, incorporating relevant sampling requirements, remediation standards, and liability provisions that reflect the evolving regulatory landscape around per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Is the output formatted for DOJ lodging and public comment requirements?

CaseMark structures the consent decree to meet DOJ lodging requirements, including the 30-day public comment period framework under 28 CFR § 50.7. The output includes the necessary procedural provisions for judicial entry after the comment period closes.

How much time does this save compared to manual drafting?

A typical EPA consent decree can take 40-80+ hours to draft manually. CaseMark generates a comprehensive first draft in approximately 14 minutes, giving attorneys a structured foundation to refine rather than building from scratch. This can reduce overall drafting time by 60-80%.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours