← All workflows

Discovery Separate Statement

Draft CA Separate Statements in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Discovery Separate Statement

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Discovery Separate Statement

Overview

CaseMark's Discovery Separate Statement skill automates the drafting of California-compliant Separate Statements required under Cal. Rules of Court rule 3.1345 for motions to compel. It transforms your verbatim discovery requests, responses, and meet-and-confer records into a structured, court-ready document with per-item blocks covering each disputed request. The AI cross-checks the output against your full motion package to ensure consistency and procedural completeness.

Drafting a California discovery Separate Statement is one of the most tedious tasks in litigation. Attorneys must manually copy verbatim request and response text, organize meet-and-confer history for each disputed item, and format everything to comply with Rule 3.1345 — all while ensuring consistency with the accompanying memorandum and declarations. A single omission can render the entire motion procedurally defective.

CaseMark automates the entire Separate Statement workflow, from motion classification and disputed-item ledger creation to per-item block drafting and cross-motion consistency checks. The AI ensures verbatim accuracy, applies proper formatting under Rule 3.1345, and includes sanctions language under CCP § 2023.030 — delivering a court-ready document in minutes instead of hours.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your verbatim discovery requests, responses, and meet-and-confer correspondence

  2. 2. AI classifies the motion type, builds a disputed-item ledger, and drafts each Separate Statement block

  3. 3. Review the formatted output for accuracy and customize relief or sanctions language

  4. 4. Export the court-ready Separate Statement in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Motion Taxonomy & Classification

  • Disputed-Item Ledger

  • Per-Item Separate Statement Blocks (Request → Response → Meet-and-Confer → Reasons → Remedy)

  • Sanctions & Relief Summary

  • Consistency Review Notes

What it handles

  • Request-by-request formatting compliant with Cal. Rules of Court 3.1345

  • Verbatim accuracy for propounding requests, responses, and objections

  • Integrated meet-and-confer chronology for each disputed item

  • Automatic motion taxonomy classification and gap checking

  • Consistency cross-check against your full motion package

  • Sanctions language under CCP § 2023.030 with customizable relief

Required documents

  • Discovery Requests & Responses

    Verbatim propounding requests with all responses, objections, qualifications, and verification status

    .pdf, .docx

  • Meet-and-Confer Correspondence

    Letters, emails, or declarations documenting the meet-and-confer process with dates and outcomes

    .pdf, .docx, .eml

Supporting documents

  • Motion Memorandum

    The accompanying memorandum of points and authorities for consistency cross-checking

    .pdf, .docx

  • Complaint or Answer

    Pleadings establishing claims and defenses tied to each discovery request

    .pdf, .docx

  • Supporting Declarations

    Attorney or party declarations referenced in the motion package

    .pdf, .docx

  • Protective Orders or ESI Protocols

    Any existing protective orders or ESI agreements affecting discovery scope

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Eliminate hours of manual formatting by automating the request-by-request Separate Statement structure

Reduce the risk of procedurally defective motions with built-in Rule 3.1345 compliance checks

Maintain verbatim accuracy through source-locked ledgers that prevent textual drift

Accelerate motion preparation with automatic sanctions language, deadline calculations, and consistency review

Questions

What types of discovery motions does this support?

CaseMark supports Separate Statements for motions to compel further responses to interrogatories, requests for production (RFPs), requests for admission (RFAs), and deposition-related disputes. It handles the full range of California Superior Court discovery motions requiring a Separate Statement under Rule 3.1345.

Does the output comply with California Rules of Court?

Yes. CaseMark drafts each Separate Statement in strict compliance with Cal. Rules of Court rule 3.1345, using the required request-by-request format. The AI also flags potential procedural gaps, such as missing verbatim text or 45-day deadline issues, to help prevent defective filings.

Can it handle local court or department-specific formatting requirements?

Absolutely. You can specify local department preferences such as IDC/JCCP requirements, table-based versus sequential text formatting, and other court-specific conventions. CaseMark adapts the output accordingly.

How does CaseMark ensure verbatim accuracy?

CaseMark source-locks each request and response from your uploaded documents, preventing textual drift. The AI builds a disputed-item ledger that ties every block directly to the original discovery text, and a consistency pass cross-checks the Separate Statement against your motion memorandum and declarations.

Does it include sanctions language?

Yes. CaseMark automatically includes sanctions language under CCP § 2023.030 with customizable relief provisions. You can adjust the sanctions request or opt for alternative remedies during the review step.

What if I don't have all the documents ready?

CaseMark requires verbatim request and response text at a minimum — the AI will prompt you if this is missing. Meet-and-confer records and the motion memorandum are strongly recommended for a complete output, but the tool applies sensible defaults for optional fields so you can begin drafting immediately.

Related