← All workflows

Discovery Separate Statement

Draft CA Separate Statements in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Discovery Separate Statement

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Discovery Separate Statement

Overview

CaseMark's Discovery Separate Statement skill automates the drafting of California-compliant Separate Statements required for motions to compel under Cal. Rules of Court 3.1345. It transforms raw discovery requests, responses, and meet-and-confer records into a fully formatted, request-by-request document ready for Superior Court filing. The AI ensures verbatim accuracy, proper legal citations, and alignment with your entire motion package.

Drafting a California discovery Separate Statement is one of the most tedious tasks in litigation practice. Each disputed item requires verbatim reproduction of the request, the full response including objections, a meet-and-confer summary, factual reasons compelling further responses, and the specific remedy sought — all formatted to strict court rules. A single omission or formatting error can render the entire motion procedurally defective.

CaseMark automates the entire Separate Statement workflow, from classifying the motion type and building a disputed-item ledger to generating fully formatted per-item blocks with verbatim text, meet-and-confer summaries, and sanctions language. The AI cross-references the output against your full motion package to catch inconsistencies, delivering a court-ready document in minutes instead of hours.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your verbatim discovery requests, responses, and meet-and-confer correspondence

  2. 2. AI classifies the motion type, builds a disputed-item ledger, and source-locks each entry

  3. 3. Review the fully formatted Separate Statement with per-item blocks aligned to Rule 3.1345

  4. 4. Export the motion-ready document in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Motion Taxonomy & Classification

  • Disputed-Item Ledger

  • Per-Item Separate Statement Blocks (Request → Response → Meet-and-Confer → Reasons → Remedy)

  • Consistency Notes Against Motion Package

  • Sanctions & Relief Summary

What it handles

  • Request-by-request formatting compliant with Cal. Rules of Court 3.1345

  • Verbatim extraction of discovery requests, responses, and objections

  • Integrated meet-and-confer summary for each disputed item

  • Automatic motion taxonomy classification and gap checking

  • Cross-referencing against memorandum, declaration, and proposed order

  • Sanctions language under CCP § 2023.030 included by default

Required documents

  • Discovery Requests & Responses

    The verbatim propounding requests and the responding party's latest responses, including objections, qualifications, and verification status

    .pdf, .docx

  • Meet-and-Confer Correspondence

    Letters, emails, or declarations documenting the meet-and-confer efforts with dates and any concessions or supplements

    .pdf, .docx, .eml

Supporting documents

  • Complaint and Answer

    Case pleadings to tie each discovery request to specific claims and defenses

    .pdf, .docx

  • Memorandum of Points and Authorities

    Draft or final memorandum supporting the motion, used for consistency cross-referencing

    .pdf, .docx

  • Protective Order or ESI Protocol

    Any existing protective orders or ESI protocols that may affect the scope of discovery sought

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Eliminate hours of manual formatting by automating the request-by-request Separate Statement structure

Reduce procedural defect risk with built-in Rule 3.1345 compliance checks

Maintain verbatim accuracy through source-locked disputed-item ledgers that prevent text drift

Ensure motion-package consistency with automated cross-referencing against memoranda, declarations, and proposed orders

Questions

Does this comply with California Rules of Court Rule 3.1345?

Yes. CaseMark structures every Separate Statement to meet the requirements of Cal. Rules of Court 3.1345, including the mandatory request-by-request format with verbatim text, factual reasons compelling further responses, and remedy sought for each item.

What types of discovery disputes does this handle?

CaseMark supports Separate Statements for interrogatories, requests for production (RFPs), requests for admission (RFAs), and deposition-related disputes. It automatically classifies the motion type and adjusts formatting accordingly.

How does CaseMark ensure verbatim accuracy?

CaseMark extracts request and response text directly from your uploaded documents and source-locks each entry in a disputed-item ledger. This prevents drift between the Separate Statement and the underlying discovery record.

Can it handle local court or department-specific formatting requirements?

Yes. CaseMark accommodates local and department-level preferences, including IDC/JCCP requirements, table versus sequential text formatting, and other court-specific conventions you specify during intake.

Does the output include sanctions language?

By default, CaseMark includes sanctions language under CCP § 2023.030. You can customize the relief sought or remove sanctions language during the review step before finalizing.

How does this integrate with the rest of my motion package?

CaseMark runs a consistency pass to cross-reference your Separate Statement against the memorandum of points and authorities, supporting declarations, and proposed order, flagging any discrepancies before you file.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

30b6 Deposition

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours