Jnov Motion

Draft JNOV Motions in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

14 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

Trial Transcript
Jury Verdict Form & Instructions
Prior Rule 50(a) Motion

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's JNOV Motion Drafter automates the creation of post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under FRCP 50(b) or state equivalents. It builds rigorous element-by-element evidentiary insufficiency arguments anchored to transcript citations while simultaneously drafting an alternative new-trial request to preserve the full appellate record.

Drafting a JNOV motion is one of the most demanding post-trial tasks in litigation. Attorneys must meticulously review hundreds or thousands of transcript pages, map evidentiary gaps to each legal element, confirm Rule 50(a) preservation, and simultaneously craft an alternative new-trial argument—all under tight post-verdict deadlines. A single missed citation or preservation error can forfeit appellate rights.

CaseMark transforms this painstaking process into a streamlined workflow. Upload your trial transcript and supporting documents, and the AI systematically analyzes the evidence element by element, generates precise transcript citations, confirms Rule 50(a) preservation, and produces a complete, filing-ready motion with alternative new-trial request and proposed order.

How it works

1. Upload your trial transcript, jury verdict and instructions, and prior Rule 50(a) motion
2. AI analyzes the record element-by-element, identifying evidentiary gaps and mapping transcript citations
3. Review the fully drafted JNOV motion with alternative new-trial request and proposed order
4. Export in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF) ready for filing

What you get

Caption & Notice of Motion
Introduction with Rule 50(a) Preservation Reference
Factual Background with Transcript Citations
Legal Standard for JNOV and New Trial
Element-by-Element JNOV Insufficiency Argument
Alternative New Trial Argument
Conclusion with Specific Relief Requested
Proposed Order

What it handles

Element-by-element evidentiary insufficiency analysis with transcript citations
Automatic alternative new-trial request to preserve appellate review
Proper Rule 50(a) preservation tracking and cross-referencing
Bluebook-compliant citations with local rule adaptation
Separate signature-ready proposed order generation
Against-the-weight-of-evidence and trial error arguments

Required documents

Trial Transcript
The official trial transcript with page and line numbers for citation mapping
.pdf, .docx, .txt
Jury Verdict Form & Instructions
The jury verdict form, special interrogatories, and jury instructions as given by the court
.pdf, .docx
Prior Rule 50(a) Motion
The directed verdict or Rule 50(a) motion filed before the case was submitted to the jury
.pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

Exhibit List & Key Exhibits
Trial exhibit list and any key exhibits referenced in insufficiency arguments
.pdf, .docx
Refused Jury Instructions
Proposed jury instructions that were refused by the court, along with any preserved objections
.pdf, .docx
Case Docket or Prior Orders
Relevant docket entries or court orders providing procedural context for the motion
.pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Dramatically reduce the hours spent manually combing transcripts and structuring element-by-element insufficiency arguments

Ensure proper Rule 50(a) preservation is documented and cross-referenced throughout the motion

Automatically generate both JNOV and alternative new-trial arguments in a single cohesive filing

Minimize the risk of missing filing deadlines with jurisdiction-aware procedural references and deadline tracking

Questions

Does this handle both federal FRCP 50(b) and state equivalents?

Yes. CaseMark adapts the motion to FRCP 50(b) or the applicable state procedural rule. Simply indicate your jurisdiction and the tool adjusts the legal standard, terminology, and filing deadline references accordingly.

How does CaseMark handle transcript citations?

CaseMark parses your uploaded trial transcript and generates precise page-and-line citations (e.g., Tr. 145:12-18) tied to each evidentiary insufficiency argument. This ensures every factual assertion is properly supported by the record.

Will the motion include an alternative new-trial request?

Absolutely. CaseMark automatically drafts an alternative motion for new trial alongside the JNOV argument, preserving your appellate options in case the court denies the primary relief.

Does the tool verify that Rule 50(a) was properly preserved?

CaseMark cross-references your uploaded prior Rule 50(a) motion to confirm directed verdict was sought before the case went to the jury—a prerequisite for any JNOV motion. It flags any potential preservation issues for your review.

Can I customize the motion for local court rules?

Yes. CaseMark adjusts formatting, citation style, hearing notice requirements, and procedural references based on your jurisdiction and local rules. You can further edit the output before filing.

How long does it take to generate a complete JNOV motion?

CaseMark typically generates a comprehensive JNOV motion with alternative new-trial request in approximately 12-15 minutes, depending on the length and complexity of the trial transcript.