← All workflows

Non Compete Agreement

Draft Enforceable Non-Competes in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Non Compete Agreement

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Non Compete Agreement

Overview

CaseMark's Non-Compete Agreement skill drafts comprehensive, enforcement-ready restrictive covenant agreements tailored to the specific requirements of your governing U.S. state jurisdiction. The AI performs deep jurisdictional analysis—covering reformation doctrine, consideration requirements, statutory restrictions, and categorical prohibitions—then produces a fully integrated non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality agreement ready for review and execution.

Drafting enforceable non-compete agreements requires navigating a patchwork of state laws, reformation doctrines, consideration requirements, and evolving federal guidance. A provision that is perfectly enforceable in one state may be void in another. Manually researching these requirements and tailoring each agreement consumes significant attorney time and introduces substantial risk of drafting errors that render the entire covenant unenforceable.

CaseMark automates the jurisdictional analysis and drafting process, producing non-compete agreements that are specifically tailored to your governing state's enforceability framework. By analyzing reformation rules, consideration requirements, salary thresholds, and statutory restrictions in real time, CaseMark delivers enforcement-ready agreements in minutes—freeing attorneys to focus on strategic counsel rather than repetitive legal research.

How it works

  1. 1. Provide employment details, governing jurisdiction, and protectable business interests

  2. 2. AI performs jurisdictional analysis of reformation rules, consideration requirements, and statutory restrictions

  3. 3. Review the fully drafted agreement with state-specific enforceability provisions

  4. 4. Export the finalized agreement in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Jurisdictional Analysis Summary

  • Non-Compete, Non-Solicitation, and Confidentiality Agreement

  • Recitals and Protectable Interest Provisions

  • Geographic and Temporal Scope Definitions

  • Consideration and Enforceability Framework

  • Remedies, Injunctive Relief, and Litigation Provisions

What it handles

  • Jurisdiction-specific enforceability analysis across all 50 states

  • Automatic detection of ban states with pivot to non-solicitation and NDA alternatives

  • Tailored consideration analysis for new hires vs. existing employees

  • Blue-pencil, reformation, and red-pencil doctrine compliance

  • Integrated non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions

  • Built-in litigation and enforcement clauses

Required documents

  • Employment Details

    Document or summary containing party information, governing jurisdiction, employee role, hire date, and level of access to confidential information

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

  • Protectable Interests Summary

    Description of the employer's legitimate business interests including trade secrets, customer relationships, specialized training, and proprietary methods

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

Supporting documents

  • Existing Agreements

    Prior employment contracts, NDAs, or restrictive covenants that may affect the new agreement's scope or enforceability

    .pdf, .docx

  • Company Policy Documents

    Employee handbooks, confidentiality policies, or trade secret protection protocols relevant to the agreement

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Eliminate hours of manual jurisdictional research with automated 50-state enforceability analysis

Reduce the risk of unenforceable provisions through doctrine-aware drafting

Seamlessly handle ban-state scenarios with automatic pivot to compliant alternatives

Produce consistent, comprehensive agreements that protect legitimate business interests while respecting employee mobility rights

Questions

How does CaseMark handle states that ban non-competes?

CaseMark automatically identifies ban states like California, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Oklahoma. When a ban state is detected, the AI pivots to drafting enforceable non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements instead, ensuring you always receive a usable, compliant document.

Does the agreement account for blue-pencil vs. reformation jurisdictions?

Yes. CaseMark analyzes whether your governing jurisdiction follows blue-pencil (strike), reformation (court modification), or red-pencil (void entire provision) doctrine and drafts provisions accordingly. This maximizes the likelihood of judicial enforcement if challenged.

Can CaseMark draft agreements for existing employees, not just new hires?

Absolutely. CaseMark distinguishes between new-hire and existing-employee scenarios, identifying whether independent consideration beyond continued at-will employment is required under your state's law and structuring the agreement accordingly.

What types of restrictive covenants are included in the output?

Each agreement integrates non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions into a single comprehensive document. CaseMark tailors the scope, duration, and geographic restrictions for each covenant type based on jurisdictional requirements and your specific protectable interests.

How does CaseMark ensure the agreement is enforceable?

CaseMark performs a multi-factor jurisdictional analysis covering reformation approach, consideration requirements, salary thresholds, categorical prohibitions, notice requirements, and current FTC regulatory guidance. The resulting agreement is drafted to meet or exceed enforceability standards in your jurisdiction.

Can I customize the geographic scope and duration of restrictions?

Yes. You provide your desired geographic territory, duration, and restricted activities, and CaseMark evaluates them against jurisdictional limits. If your desired scope risks unenforceability, the AI recommends adjustments aligned with prevailing case law and statutory restrictions.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

30b6 Deposition

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours