← All workflows

Non Compete Agreement

Draft Enforceable Non-Competes in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Non Compete Agreement

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Non Compete Agreement

Overview

CaseMark's Non-Compete Agreement skill drafts fully enforceable restrictive covenant agreements tailored to the specific requirements of your governing U.S. state jurisdiction. The AI performs deep jurisdictional analysis covering reformation doctrines, consideration requirements, statutory restrictions, and categorical bans, then generates a comprehensive agreement integrating non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions with built-in litigation readiness.

Drafting enforceable non-compete agreements requires navigating a patchwork of state laws, reformation doctrines, consideration requirements, and evolving federal regulations. A single misstep — wrong consideration for an existing employee, overly broad geographic scope, or failure to account for a state ban — can render the entire agreement void and leave critical business interests unprotected.

CaseMark automates the entire non-compete drafting workflow by performing real-time jurisdictional analysis and generating agreements precisely calibrated to your governing state's enforceability standards. The result is a comprehensive, litigation-ready restrictive covenant agreement that protects your client's legitimate business interests while respecting employee mobility rights and statutory limitations.

How it works

  1. 1. Provide employment details, governing jurisdiction, and desired restrictive covenant scope

  2. 2. AI performs jurisdictional analysis of reformation rules, consideration requirements, and statutory restrictions

  3. 3. Review the fully drafted agreement with state-specific enforceability provisions

  4. 4. Export the finalized agreement in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Jurisdictional Analysis Summary

  • Non-Compete, Non-Solicitation, and Confidentiality Agreement

  • Recitals and Protectable Interest Provisions

  • Geographic and Temporal Scope Definitions

  • Enforcement and Litigation Provisions

  • Consideration and Severability Clauses

What it handles

  • Jurisdiction-specific enforceability analysis across all 50 states

  • Automatic detection of ban states with pivot to non-solicitation and NDA alternatives

  • Blue-pencil, reformation, and red-pencil doctrine compliance

  • Consideration requirement analysis for new hires vs. existing employees

  • Integrated non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions

  • Built-in litigation and enforcement provisions

Required documents

  • Employment Details

    Document or summary containing party information, employee role and title, hire or promotion date, governing jurisdiction, and access level to confidential information

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

  • Protectable Interests Summary

    Description of the employer's legitimate business interests including trade secrets, customer relationships, specialized training, and proprietary methods to be protected

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

Supporting documents

  • Existing Agreements

    Prior employment contracts, NDAs, or restrictive covenants currently in effect for the employee

    .pdf, .docx

  • Company Policy Documents

    Employee handbooks, confidentiality policies, or trade secret protection protocols that inform the scope of restrictions

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Eliminate hours of manual jurisdictional research with automated state-law enforceability analysis

Reduce risk of unenforceable agreements through doctrine-specific drafting and severability provisions

Seamlessly handle ban-state scenarios with automatic pivots to compliant non-solicitation and NDA alternatives

Produce litigation-ready agreements with integrated enforcement, injunctive relief, and forum selection provisions

Questions

How does CaseMark handle states that ban non-competes?

CaseMark automatically identifies ban states like California, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Oklahoma. When these jurisdictions are selected, the AI pivots to drafting enforceable non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements instead, ensuring you always receive a usable, compliant document.

Does the agreement account for different consideration requirements?

Yes. CaseMark analyzes whether your jurisdiction requires independent consideration for existing employees versus new hires. The generated agreement includes appropriate consideration language based on the employment timing and applicable state law requirements.

What reformation doctrine does CaseMark apply?

CaseMark identifies whether your governing jurisdiction follows blue-pencil (strike offending terms), reformation (court modifies to reasonable scope), or red-pencil (voids entire provision) doctrine. The agreement is structured to maximize enforceability under the applicable approach.

Can I customize the geographic scope and duration of restrictions?

Absolutely. You specify your desired geographic territory, duration, and restricted activities. CaseMark then evaluates those parameters against jurisdictional limits and statutory restrictions, flagging any provisions that may face enforceability challenges.

Does CaseMark address the FTC's proposed non-compete ban?

CaseMark incorporates current federal regulatory guidance and pending legislation into its analysis. The generated agreements include severability and fallback provisions designed to preserve enforceability even if federal rules change.

What types of restrictive covenants are included in the output?

Each agreement generated by CaseMark integrates non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality provisions into a single comprehensive document, along with enforcement mechanisms, injunctive relief language, and litigation provisions.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours