← All workflows

Oci Mitigation Plan

Draft FAR 9.5 OCI Mitigation Plans in Minutes

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Oci Mitigation Plan

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Oci Mitigation Plan

Overview

CaseMark's OCI Mitigation Plan skill automates the complex process of drafting FAR Subpart 9.5-compliant organizational conflict of interest mitigation plans for federal government contractors. It analyzes your corporate structure, prior government work, and current procurement details to identify conflicts across all three FAR categories, then generates tailored mitigation strategies, compliance frameworks, and binding certifications ready for submission.

Drafting OCI mitigation plans is one of the most time-intensive and high-stakes tasks in federal contracting. Attorneys and compliance professionals must manually cross-reference corporate structures, prior contracts, solicitation requirements, and FAR provisions to identify conflicts and craft defensible mitigation strategies. A single oversight can result in proposal disqualification, contract termination, or debarment proceedings.

CaseMark automates the end-to-end OCI mitigation plan process by analyzing your uploaded documents against all FAR 9.5 conflict categories, assessing materiality, and generating tailored mitigation measures with full compliance architecture. The result is a submission-ready plan that would typically take days of manual drafting, produced in minutes with consistent quality and comprehensive coverage.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your solicitation documents, corporate structure details, and any prior OCI correspondence

  2. 2. AI analyzes all three FAR 9.5 conflict categories for materiality against your specific procurement

  3. 3. Review the generated mitigation plan with tailored firewalls, recusals, and compliance architecture

  4. 4. Export the finalized OCI mitigation plan in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Executive Summary with Conflict-to-Mitigation Table

  • Conflict Identification & Materiality Analysis

  • Tailored Mitigation Measures & Firewalls

  • Compliance Architecture & Monitoring Framework

  • Binding Officer Certification

What it handles

  • Automated FAR 9.5 conflict category analysis across unequal access, impaired objectivity, and biased ground rules

  • Tailored firewall and information barrier architecture for each identified conflict

  • Recusal protocols and personnel screening frameworks

  • Compliance monitoring and periodic audit schedules

  • Binding officer certification language ready for execution

  • Summary conflict-to-mitigation mapping table

Required documents

  • Solicitation & Statement of Work

    The solicitation package including the statement of work, performance work statement, or requirements document for the target procurement

    .pdf, .docx

  • Corporate Structure & Prior Contracts

    Documentation of your corporate family structure, parent-subsidiary relationships, and relevant prior or current government contracts

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Prior OCI Correspondence

    Any prior communications with the contracting officer regarding OCI concerns or disclosures

    .pdf, .docx, .msg

  • Teaming & Subcontractor Agreements

    Teaming agreements, subcontractor arrangements, joint venture documents, or consulting agreements relevant to the procurement

    .pdf, .docx

  • Non-Public Information Inventory

    Inventory or description of non-public government information accessed through prior contracts that may be relevant to the current procurement

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

Why teams use it

Reduce OCI mitigation plan drafting time from days to minutes while maintaining FAR 9.5 compliance

Ensure comprehensive conflict analysis across all three categories—unequal access, impaired objectivity, and biased ground rules

Generate professionally structured plans with firewalls, recusals, and monitoring frameworks tailored to your specific procurement

Strengthen proposal competitiveness with thorough, well-documented OCI disclosures that demonstrate proactive compliance

Questions

What types of OCI conflicts does this tool analyze?

CaseMark analyzes all three FAR Subpart 9.5 conflict categories: unequal access to information (9.505-4), impaired objectivity (9.505-3), and biased ground rules (9.505-1, 9.505-2). Each category is assessed for materiality based on your specific procurement and corporate relationships.

Can I use this for proposal OCI disclosures?

Yes. CaseMark generates OCI mitigation plans suitable for proposal submissions, responses to contracting officer requests, and voluntary disclosures. The output includes the formal structure and certification language expected by federal agencies.

Does the tool account for parent-subsidiary and teaming relationships?

Absolutely. CaseMark analyzes your full corporate family structure, including parent companies, subsidiaries, joint ventures, teaming agreements, and subcontractor relationships to identify all potential conflict vectors across your organizational network.

How does CaseMark ensure the mitigation measures are tailored to my situation?

Rather than producing generic templates, CaseMark maps each identified conflict to specific mitigation strategies—firewalls, recusals, information barriers, personnel screening—based on the nature of the conflict, the procurement scope, and your organizational structure.

Is the output ready to submit to a contracting officer?

CaseMark produces a professionally structured mitigation plan with all required elements, including binding certification language. However, we recommend legal counsel review the final document before submission, as each contracting officer may have specific expectations.

What if no material conflict is identified in a category?

CaseMark documents the analysis for each FAR 9.5 category regardless of outcome. If a category presents no material conflict, the plan includes the reasoning and supporting facts, demonstrating thorough due diligence to the contracting officer.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours