← All workflows

Patent Infringement Analysis

AI Patent Infringement Analysis in Minutes, Not Days

15 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

15 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

  • Asserted Patent Documents
  • Accused Product Documentation
  • Prior Art References

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's Patent Infringement Analysis skill transforms complex patent documents, accused product specifications, and prior art into a comprehensive, structured infringement report. The AI generates element-by-element claim charts, applies the Phillips claim construction framework, evaluates both literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents, and delivers actionable strategic recommendations—all in a fraction of the time required for manual analysis.

Patent infringement analysis is one of the most time-intensive tasks in IP litigation, requiring attorneys to manually parse dense patent specifications, map individual claim elements to accused product features, and synthesize prosecution history—often across multiple patents and products. A single comprehensive claim chart can take days to prepare, and the risk of missing a critical element or prosecution disclaimer can undermine an entire litigation strategy.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of patent infringement analysis by ingesting patent documents, accused product materials, and prior art to generate structured claim charts and comprehensive infringement reports. The AI applies established legal frameworks including Phillips claim construction and Doctrine of Equivalents analysis, delivering a complete first draft that patent attorneys can review and refine in a fraction of the traditional timeline.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload asserted patent documents, accused product materials, and prior art references

  2. 2. AI maps each claim element to accused product features and constructs detailed claim charts

  3. 3. Review the structured infringement analysis including claim construction, DOE, and validity defenses

  4. 4. Export the complete report in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Executive Summary with Per-Claim Conclusions

  • Patent Overview & Prosecution History Highlights

  • Claim Construction Analysis (Phillips Framework)

  • Element-by-Element Claim Charts

  • Literal Infringement Analysis

  • Doctrine of Equivalents Analysis

  • Validity Defense Assessment

  • Damages Framework & Exposure Estimate

  • Strategic Recommendations & Next Steps

What it handles

  • Automated claim chart mapping accused product features to patent claims

  • Phillips v. AWH claim construction analysis with specification and prosecution history

  • Literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents evaluation per element

  • Validity defense assessment including prior art and prosecution estoppel

  • Damages framework with reasonable royalty and lost profits analysis

  • Strategic recommendations for licensing, design-around, and litigation posture

Required documents

  • Asserted Patent Documents

    Patent specification, claims, and file history including prosecution documents, amendments, and office action responses

    .pdf, .docx

  • Accused Product Documentation

    Technical specifications, product manuals, marketing materials, drawings, schematics, or reverse engineering reports for the accused product or process

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Prior Art References

    Relevant prior art patents, publications, and technical standards related to the asserted patent technology

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Existing Claim Construction Briefing

    Any prior Markman briefing, court orders on claim construction, or expert reports on disputed terms

    .pdf, .docx

  • Licensing Agreements

    Comparable license agreements relevant to damages analysis and reasonable royalty calculations

    .pdf, .docx

  • Related Litigation Materials

    Complaints, invalidity contentions, or IPR petitions from related proceedings involving the same patents

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce patent infringement analysis time from days or weeks to minutes, freeing attorneys to focus on strategy and client counsel

Ensure comprehensive coverage with systematic element-by-element mapping that minimizes the risk of overlooking critical claim limitations

Strengthen litigation positioning with structured claim construction analysis grounded in the Phillips framework and prosecution history

Accelerate decision-making with clear strategic recommendations covering licensing, design-around, and litigation options

Questions

What types of patent claims can CaseMark analyze?

CaseMark handles both independent and dependent claims across utility patents, including method, apparatus, and system claims. The AI maps each claim element to corresponding features of the accused product or process, supporting both literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents analysis.

How does CaseMark handle claim construction?

CaseMark applies the Phillips v. AWH Corp. framework, analyzing claim language, specification context, prosecution history, and extrinsic evidence to propose constructions for disputed terms. Each construction is supported by citations to the relevant sources, giving you a defensible starting point for Markman proceedings.

Can this replace a patent attorney's infringement opinion?

CaseMark's analysis is designed to accelerate and structure the work of patent attorneys and technical experts, not replace their judgment. The AI-generated report provides a comprehensive first draft that professionals can review, refine, and validate before relying on it for litigation or licensing decisions.

How does CaseMark address validity defenses?

CaseMark evaluates potential invalidity arguments including anticipation, obviousness, written description, enablement, and indefiniteness based on the prior art and prosecution history you provide. The analysis identifies the strongest validity challenges and assesses their likely impact on the overall infringement posture.

What if I don't have complete accused product documentation?

CaseMark will work with the materials you provide and clearly flag any claim elements where technical information is missing or insufficient. The report identifies these gaps as key uncertainties, helping you prioritize discovery requests or reverse engineering efforts.

Does CaseMark provide damages estimates?

CaseMark generates a damages framework covering reasonable royalty and lost profits methodologies, identifies relevant Georgia-Pacific factors, and flags apportionment considerations. While not a substitute for expert damages analysis, it provides a structured foundation for assessing financial exposure.

Related