← All workflows

Patent Infringement Analysis

Analyze Patent Infringement in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Patent Infringement Analysis

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Patent Infringement Analysis

Overview

CaseMark's Patent Infringement Analysis skill automates the labor-intensive process of mapping patent claims to accused product features, generating comprehensive claim charts and structured legal analysis. It applies the Phillips claim construction framework, evaluates literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents, assesses validity defenses, and delivers actionable strategic recommendations — all in a fraction of the time required for manual analysis.

Patent infringement analysis is one of the most time-consuming tasks in IP litigation. Manually mapping dozens of claim elements to accused product features, constructing Phillips-compliant claim interpretations, and evaluating both literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents requires attorneys to cross-reference thousands of pages of patent specifications, prosecution histories, and technical documentation — often taking days or weeks per patent.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of patent infringement analysis by ingesting patent documents, accused product materials, and prior art references to generate structured claim charts with element-by-element mapping. The AI applies the Phillips claim construction framework, evaluates infringement under both literal and equivalents theories, identifies validity defenses, and produces strategic recommendations — delivering a comprehensive first-draft report that attorneys can refine and finalize.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your asserted patent documents, accused product materials, and prior art references

  2. 2. AI maps each claim element to accused product features using Phillips claim construction principles

  3. 3. Review the generated claim charts, infringement analysis, and strategic recommendations

  4. 4. Export the complete infringement report in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Executive Summary with Per-Claim Conclusions

  • Patent Overview & Prosecution History

  • Claim Construction Analysis (Phillips Framework)

  • Claim Charts — Literal Infringement

  • Doctrine of Equivalents Analysis

  • Validity Defenses & Prior Art Assessment

  • Damages & Remedies Framework

  • Strategic Recommendations

What it handles

  • Automated claim-to-product feature mapping via structured claim charts

  • Phillips v. AWH claim construction analysis with specification and prosecution history

  • Literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents evaluation for each claim element

  • Validity defense assessment including prior art and prosecution estoppel

  • Damages framework analysis covering reasonable royalty and lost profits

  • Strategic recommendations for licensing, design-around, and litigation posture

Required documents

  • Asserted Patent Documents

    Patent specification, claims, file history, prosecution documents, amendments, and office action responses for the asserted patent(s)

    .pdf, .docx

  • Accused Product Documentation

    Technical specifications, user manuals, marketing materials, drawings, schematics, or reverse engineering reports for the accused product or process

    .pdf, .docx

  • Prior Art References

    Relevant prior art patents, publications, and technical standards related to the asserted technology

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Claim Construction Briefing

    Any existing Markman briefing, claim construction orders, or term dispute lists from related proceedings

    .pdf, .docx

  • Expert Reports

    Technical expert declarations or reports relevant to claim interpretation or product functionality

    .pdf, .docx

  • Licensing Agreements

    Existing license agreements related to the patent portfolio for damages and royalty analysis

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce claim chart preparation time from days to minutes with automated element-by-element mapping

Ensure thorough Phillips framework analysis covering claim language, specification, and prosecution history

Identify Doctrine of Equivalents arguments and prosecution history estoppel risks systematically

Receive actionable strategic recommendations covering litigation, licensing, and design-around options

Questions

What types of patent documents does CaseMark analyze?

CaseMark processes patent specifications, claims, file histories, prosecution documents, office action responses, and amendments. It also analyzes accused product documentation including technical specs, manuals, schematics, and marketing materials.

How does CaseMark handle claim construction?

CaseMark applies the Phillips v. AWH Corp. framework, analyzing claim language, specification context, prosecution history, and extrinsic evidence to construct disputed terms as a person of ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) would understand them.

Does the analysis cover the Doctrine of Equivalents?

Yes. CaseMark evaluates each claim element under both literal infringement and the Doctrine of Equivalents, applying the function-way-result test and identifying potential prosecution history estoppel limitations.

Can CaseMark assess patent validity defenses?

CaseMark identifies potential invalidity arguments based on prior art references you provide, analyzes anticipation and obviousness grounds, and flags prosecution history issues that may affect enforceability.

How accurate is the AI-generated infringement analysis?

CaseMark produces a comprehensive first draft that significantly accelerates attorney review. The analysis is designed to be reviewed and refined by qualified patent counsel — it provides structured analysis, not legal advice.

What output formats are available for the infringement report?

CaseMark exports the complete patent infringement analysis, including claim charts and strategic recommendations, in DOCX and PDF formats ready for client delivery or internal review.

Related