← All workflows

Patent Infringement Analysis

Analyze Patent Infringement in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Patent Infringement Analysis

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Patent Infringement Analysis

Overview

CaseMark's Patent Infringement Analysis skill transforms complex patent documents and accused product materials into a comprehensive, structured infringement report. The AI generates detailed claim charts, applies the Phillips claim construction framework, evaluates literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents, and delivers strategic recommendations — all in a fraction of the time required for manual analysis.

Patent infringement analysis is one of the most time-intensive tasks in IP litigation. Manually constructing claim charts, parsing prosecution histories for estoppel arguments, and mapping each claim element to accused product features can consume hundreds of attorney hours — delaying critical strategic decisions and driving up litigation costs.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of patent infringement analysis by ingesting patent specifications, prosecution histories, and accused product documentation to generate structured claim charts and comprehensive infringement reports. The AI applies the Phillips claim construction framework, evaluates both literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents, and surfaces validity defenses and damages considerations — giving your team a litigation-ready first draft in minutes.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload asserted patent documents, accused product materials, and prior art references

  2. 2. AI maps each claim element to accused product features using Phillips claim construction

  3. 3. Review detailed claim charts, infringement analysis, and validity defenses

  4. 4. Export the complete analysis in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Executive Summary with Per-Claim Conclusions

  • Patent Overview & Prosecution History Highlights

  • Claim Construction Analysis (Phillips Framework)

  • Claim Charts — Literal Infringement

  • Doctrine of Equivalents Analysis

  • Validity Defenses & Prior Art Assessment

  • Damages Framework & Exposure Estimate

  • Strategic Recommendations & Next Steps

What it handles

  • Structured claim charts mapping patent claims to accused product features

  • Phillips v. AWH claim construction with specification and prosecution history analysis

  • Literal infringement and Doctrine of Equivalents evaluation per claim element

  • Validity defense assessment including prior art and prosecution estoppel

  • Damages framework covering reasonable royalty and lost profits theories

  • Strategic recommendations for licensing, design-around, and litigation posture

Required documents

  • Asserted Patent Documents

    Patent specification, claims, and prosecution history including file wrapper, amendments, and office action responses

    .pdf, .docx

  • Accused Product Documentation

    Technical specifications, product manuals, marketing materials, schematics, or reverse engineering reports for the accused product or process

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Asserted Claims List

    Identification of which independent and dependent claims are at issue in the analysis

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Prior Art References

    Relevant prior art patents, publications, or technical standards for validity defense analysis

    .pdf, .docx

  • Court Orders or Claim Construction Rulings

    Any existing Markman rulings or claim construction orders from related proceedings

    .pdf, .docx

  • Licensing Agreements

    Existing license agreements relevant to damages analysis or comparable royalty rates

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce patent infringement analysis time from days or weeks to minutes with AI-generated claim charts and structured reports

Ensure comprehensive coverage of every claim element with systematic element-by-element mapping to accused product features

Identify validity defenses, prosecution estoppel issues, and damages exposure early to inform litigation strategy

Deliver consistent, thorough analyses across your patent portfolio whether evaluating one patent or dozens

Questions

What types of patents can CaseMark analyze for infringement?

CaseMark handles utility patents across all technology domains, including software, mechanical, electrical, chemical, and biotech patents. The AI adapts its analysis to the specific technical field and claim structure of each patent.

How does CaseMark perform claim construction?

CaseMark applies the Phillips v. AWH Corp. framework, analyzing claim language, specification context, prosecution history, and relevant extrinsic evidence. It identifies disputed terms and provides construction arguments from both patentee and accused infringer perspectives.

Does the analysis cover the Doctrine of Equivalents?

Yes. CaseMark evaluates each claim element under the function-way-result test and the insubstantial differences test. It also flags prosecution history estoppel and other limitations on DOE arguments.

Can CaseMark assess patent validity defenses?

CaseMark identifies potential invalidity arguments including anticipation, obviousness, written description, enablement, and indefiniteness based on the prior art and prosecution history you provide. This helps you evaluate the full litigation risk picture.

How accurate are the claim charts CaseMark generates?

CaseMark produces detailed element-by-element claim charts that serve as a strong first draft for litigation teams. Every mapping should be reviewed by qualified patent counsel and technical experts before use in legal proceedings.

Is my patent data secure when using CaseMark?

Absolutely. CaseMark employs enterprise-grade encryption, strict access controls, and data isolation. Your patent documents, trade secrets, and analysis results are never used to train AI models or shared with third parties.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours