← All workflows

Cpom Compliance

Draft CPOM Compliance Structures in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

12 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

  • Entity Organizational Documents
  • Jurisdictional & Business Model Summary

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's CPOM Compliance skill automates the complex process of drafting Corporate Practice of Medicine compliance frameworks for healthcare entities. It generates state-specific regulatory analyses, compares compliant organizational models, and produces MSA/MSO architecture documents tailored to your entity's operational footprint. What traditionally takes days of research and drafting is completed in minutes with AI-powered precision.

Structuring healthcare operations to comply with CPOM doctrine requires painstaking state-by-state regulatory research, careful analysis of organizational models, and precise drafting of management services arrangements. A single misstep in separating corporate ownership from clinical control can result in license revocation, voided contracts, or criminal prosecution. The manual process of researching jurisdictional requirements and drafting compliant structures can consume days of attorney time.

CaseMark automates CPOM compliance drafting by analyzing your entity's specific operational footprint, generating tailored jurisdictional matrices, and producing comprehensive organizational structure comparisons with risk assessments. The AI drafts MSA/MSO architecture frameworks, operational compliance checklists, and governance requirements—all calibrated to your states, sectors, and business model—so attorneys can focus on strategic counsel rather than foundational research.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your entity details, existing agreements, and jurisdictional information

  2. 2. AI analyzes CPOM requirements across your operational footprint and evaluates current structures

  3. 3. Review the generated compliance framework, organizational models, and risk assessments

  4. 4. Export your complete CPOM compliance package in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Introduction & CPOM Doctrine Scope

  • State-Specific CPOM Jurisdictional Matrix

  • Compliant Organizational Structure Analysis

  • MSA/MSO Architecture & Drafting Framework

  • Operational Compliance Checklists

  • Risk Assessment & Remediation Recommendations

What it handles

  • State-specific CPOM jurisdictional matrix with prohibition levels and key statutes

  • Compliant organizational structure comparison (PC/PA, MSO, Friendly PC, PPM)

  • MSA/MSO architecture drafting with operational boundary definitions

  • Operational compliance checklists for physician control and governance

  • De facto control scrutiny analysis and risk assessment

  • Friendly PC risk flagging with regulatory warning framework

Required documents

  • Entity Organizational Documents

    Articles of incorporation, operating agreements, and organizational charts showing current entity structure

    .pdf, .docx

  • Jurisdictional & Business Model Summary

    Summary of states of operation, healthcare sectors, revenue structure, and physician compensation methodology

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

Supporting documents

  • Existing MSA/MSO Agreements

    Current management services agreements or MSO arrangements for compliance review

    .pdf, .docx

  • Physician Employment Contracts

    Existing physician employment or independent contractor agreements

    .pdf, .docx

  • Governance Documents

    Board resolutions, bylaws, or governance policies related to clinical decision-making authority

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Rapidly generate jurisdictional matrices covering CPOM prohibition levels, statutes, and exemptions for every state in your operational footprint

Compare organizational structures (PC/PA, MSO, Friendly PC, PPM) with clear risk assessments and selection criteria tailored to your business model

Draft MSA/MSO frameworks that maintain compliant separation between administrative services and clinical decision-making

Identify de facto control risks and receive actionable remediation recommendations before regulators do

Questions

What is the Corporate Practice of Medicine doctrine and why does this matter?

CPOM prohibits non-physician entities from owning medical practices or controlling clinical decisions in many states. Violations can result in license revocation, contract voidability, and criminal prosecution. CaseMark helps you draft compliant structures that navigate these restrictions.

Does CaseMark analyze CPOM rules for my specific states?

Yes. CaseMark generates a jurisdictional matrix tailored to your entity's actual operational footprint, covering prohibition levels, key statutes, exemptions, and enforcement patterns for each state where you operate or plan to expand.

Can CaseMark help structure MSO/MSA arrangements?

Absolutely. CaseMark drafts MSA/MSO architecture frameworks that maintain the required separation between administrative management and clinical decision-making, ensuring your management services arrangements withstand regulatory scrutiny.

How does CaseMark handle Friendly PC structures?

CaseMark never presents Friendly PC arrangements as low-risk. The AI flags the heightened regulatory scrutiny these structures face and provides detailed guidance on the specific risks, governance requirements, and circumstances where they may or may not be appropriate.

Does this replace legal counsel for CPOM compliance?

CaseMark is designed to accelerate the work of healthcare attorneys and compliance professionals, not replace them. The generated documents provide a comprehensive analytical framework and draft structures that should be reviewed and finalized by qualified legal counsel.

What healthcare sectors does the CPOM analysis cover?

CaseMark analyzes CPOM implications across multiple healthcare sectors including medical, dental, optometry, telemedicine, and physical therapy, noting sector-specific variations in regulatory scrutiny and exemptions.

Related