← All workflows

Dischargeability Complaint

Draft §523 Dischargeability Complaints in Minutes

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Dischargeability Complaint

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Dischargeability Complaint

Overview

CaseMark's Dischargeability Complaint skill drafts court-ready adversary complaints under 11 U.S.C. §523 for creditors seeking to except debts from a debtor's bankruptcy discharge. The AI analyzes your case documents, maps transaction facts to the required legal elements for each §523 theory, and produces a fully structured complaint with jurisdiction allegations, evidence-anchored counts, and a traceable prayer for relief.

Drafting adversary complaints under §523 is one of the most detail-intensive tasks in bankruptcy litigation. Each non-dischargeability theory requires precise element pleading, evidence mapping, and compliance with FRBP deadlines and local court rules. Manual drafting consumes hours of attorney time and creates significant risk of omitted allegations or missed filing windows.

CaseMark automates the entire adversary complaint drafting process by analyzing your uploaded case documents, transaction evidence, and standing documentation against the specific elements required for each §523 subsection. The AI generates a complete, court-ready complaint with proper jurisdiction and venue allegations, chronological fact pleading tied to exhibits, theory-specific counts, and a damages prayer traceable to source documents.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload debtor case documents, transaction evidence, and standing documentation

  2. 2. AI analyzes facts against §523 subsection elements and maps evidence to allegations

  3. 3. Review the fully drafted adversary complaint with theory-specific counts

  4. 4. Export the filing-ready complaint in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Caption and Case Information

  • Jurisdiction and Venue Allegations

  • Party Identification and Standing Chain

  • Procedural Posture and Deadline Compliance

  • Chronological Factual Narrative

  • Theory-Specific Counts with Element Pleading

  • Prayer for Relief and Damages

  • Verification and Service Checklist

What it handles

  • Theory-specific element pleading for §523(a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(6)

  • Automatic jurisdiction and venue allegations under 28 U.S.C. §§1334 and 157

  • FRBP 4007(c) deadline verification and procedural posture analysis

  • Evidence-anchored factual narrative with exhibit mapping

  • Complete prayer for relief with traceable damages calculations

  • Verification block and service checklist for filing-ready output

Required documents

  • Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules

    The debtor's bankruptcy petition, schedules, and §341 meeting notice providing case number, court, chapter, petition date, and meeting date

    .pdf, .docx

  • Transaction Evidence

    Contracts, account records, correspondence, payment history, admissions, and other documents supporting the factual allegations

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Standing Documentation

    Documents establishing the plaintiff's right to enforce the debt, such as assignment agreements, subrogation records, or original creditor documentation

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Prior Court Orders or Judgments

    Any pre-petition judgments, orders, or rulings relevant to the underlying debt or debtor's conduct

    .pdf, .docx

  • Local Court Rules Reference

    Specific local bankruptcy court formatting rules, caption requirements, or filing protocols for the target court

    .pdf, .docx

  • Fiduciary Agreements

    Trust agreements, partnership documents, or other instruments establishing a fiduciary relationship for §523(a)(4) claims

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce adversary complaint drafting from hours to minutes with AI-powered automation

Ensure every §523 theory is pleaded with all required elements under controlling circuit law

Eliminate missed allegations by automatically mapping evidence to factual assertions

Produce filing-ready complaints with proper jurisdiction, venue, and procedural posture

Questions

Which §523 subsections does this skill support?

CaseMark supports the most commonly litigated §523 theories, including §523(a)(2)(A) for fraud and false representation, §523(a)(4) for fiduciary defalcation, and §523(a)(6) for willful and malicious injury. The AI maps your facts to the required elements under controlling circuit law.

Does the complaint comply with local bankruptcy court rules?

CaseMark generates a complaint scaffold that follows Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and standard adversary proceeding formatting. You can specify your local court's caption format, paragraph style, line numbering, and margin requirements so the output is filing-ready.

How does CaseMark handle the FRBP 4007(c) filing deadline?

CaseMark analyzes the petition date and first §341 meeting date you provide to verify your filing window under Rule 4007(c). If the deadline has passed, the AI will flag the issue and note any applicable extension basis in the procedural posture section.

Can I use this if I'm an assignee or subrogee rather than the original creditor?

Yes. CaseMark builds a complete standing chain in the complaint based on the documentation you upload. Whether you are the original creditor, an assignee, successor, or subrogee, the AI will plead the appropriate standing allegations.

How accurate are the damages calculations in the prayer for relief?

CaseMark traces all damages figures—principal, contractual interest, statutory interest, fees, and costs—directly to the evidence you provide. You should review the calculations for accuracy, but the AI ensures every amount in the prayer is tied to a specific source document.

How long does it take to generate a complaint?

CaseMark typically generates a complete adversary complaint in approximately 10–12 minutes, depending on the complexity of the facts and number of §523 theories. This replaces what often takes several hours of manual drafting and research.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours