← All workflows

Dischargeability Complaint

Draft §523 Dischargeability Complaints in Minutes

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Dischargeability Complaint

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Dischargeability Complaint

Overview

CaseMark's Dischargeability Complaint skill automatically drafts court-ready adversary complaints under 11 U.S.C. §523 for U.S. bankruptcy proceedings. It analyzes debtor case data, transaction evidence, and standing documentation to produce fully structured complaints with jurisdiction allegations, evidence-anchored counts, and FRBP-compliant formatting.

Drafting adversary complaints under §523 is one of the most time-intensive tasks in bankruptcy litigation. Each theory of non-dischargeability requires precise element-by-element pleading, evidence mapping, jurisdictional allegations, and strict compliance with FRBP deadlines—all while conforming to local court formatting rules. A single missed element or deadline can be fatal to the claim.

CaseMark automates the entire complaint drafting process by analyzing your case data, mapping facts to §523 elements, and generating a fully structured adversary complaint with proper jurisdiction, standing, and damages allegations. The AI verifies FRBP 4007(c) deadlines, anchors every allegation to supporting evidence, and formats the output to your local court's specifications—delivering a court-ready pleading in minutes.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload debtor case data, transaction evidence, and standing documentation

  2. 2. AI analyzes §523 theories, maps elements to facts, and verifies FRBP deadlines

  3. 3. Review the fully drafted adversary complaint with evidence-anchored allegations

  4. 4. Export the court-ready complaint in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Caption and Case Information

  • Jurisdiction and Venue Allegations

  • Party Identification and Standing Chain

  • Procedural Posture and Deadline Compliance

  • Chronological Factual Narrative

  • Theory-Specific Counts with Elements

  • Prayer for Relief and Damages

  • Verification and Service Checklist

What it handles

  • Theory-specific count drafting for §523(a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(6) with all required elements

  • Jurisdiction and venue allegations under 28 U.S.C. §§1334 and 157(b)(2)(I)

  • FRBP 4007(c) deadline verification and procedural posture analysis

  • Evidence-anchored factual narratives with chronological organization

  • Damages calculation with principal, interest, fees, and costs tracing

  • Local rule-compliant formatting with caption, verification, and service checklist

Required documents

  • Debtor Case Information

    Bankruptcy case number, court, chapter, petition date, first §341 meeting date, and any conversion history

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

  • Transaction Evidence

    Contracts, account records, correspondence, payment history, admissions, and other documents supporting the §523 theories

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

  • Standing Documentation

    Documents establishing plaintiff's enforcement right, including original agreements, assignments, succession documents, or subrogation records

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Local Court Rules

    Specific formatting requirements, caption conventions, and filing protocols for the target bankruptcy court

    .pdf, .docx

  • Prior Court Orders

    Any relevant orders including deadline extensions, case conversion orders, or prior rulings in the bankruptcy case

    .pdf, .docx

  • Damages Calculation

    Detailed breakdown of principal, interest, fees, and costs with supporting calculations

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

Why teams use it

Reduce complaint drafting time from hours to minutes with AI-powered automation

Ensure every §523 theory includes all required elements under controlling circuit law

Eliminate missed deadlines with automatic FRBP 4007(c) verification and flagging

Produce consistently formatted, court-ready pleadings that comply with local rules

Questions

Which §523 subsections does this skill support?

CaseMark supports the most commonly litigated §523 theories, including §523(a)(2)(A) for fraud and false representation, §523(a)(4) for fiduciary defalcation, and §523(a)(6) for willful and malicious injury. Each count is drafted with all required elements under controlling circuit law.

Does the complaint comply with Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure?

Yes. CaseMark drafts complaints that comply with FRBP requirements, including Rule 4007(c) deadline verification, Rule 7001 adversary proceeding standards, and proper jurisdictional allegations under 28 U.S.C. §§1334 and 157. The output also flags any deadline concerns for your review.

Can I customize the complaint for my local bankruptcy court's rules?

Absolutely. CaseMark incorporates local rule requirements for caption format, paragraph numbering, line spacing, font, margins, and filing protocols. You can specify your district's requirements in the upload, and the AI will format accordingly.

How does CaseMark handle the standing chain for assignees or subrogees?

CaseMark analyzes your standing documentation—whether you are the original creditor, assignee, successor, or subrogee—and drafts complete standing allegations tracing the chain of enforcement rights from the original obligation through each transfer to the current plaintiff.

Will the complaint include a damages calculation?

Yes. CaseMark traces damages to your supporting evidence, including principal amounts, contractual interest, statutory interest, attorneys' fees, and costs. The prayer for relief itemizes each component with references to the underlying documentation.

How long does it take to generate a dischargeability complaint?

CaseMark typically generates a complete, court-ready adversary complaint in approximately 12 minutes. This replaces what traditionally takes several hours of manual drafting, research, and formatting.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours