← All workflows

Expert Report Class Damages

Draft Expert Damages Reports in Minutes, Not Days

14 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Expert Report Class Damages

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Expert Report Class Damages

Overview

CaseMark's Expert Report on Class Damages skill drafts comprehensive, litigation-ready expert reports for class action proceedings. The AI structures the entire report to satisfy Daubert/FRE 702 admissibility requirements and FRCP 23(b)(3) predominance standards, covering everything from expert qualifications and methodology selection to class-wide damages calculations and opposing expert rebuttals.

Drafting expert damages reports for class actions is one of the most time-intensive tasks in complex litigation. Attorneys and experts spend days assembling qualifications, selecting and defending methodologies, calculating class-wide damages, and ensuring every section withstands Daubert scrutiny. A single structural oversight can jeopardize admissibility and derail class certification.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of expert report drafting by analyzing your uploaded evidence, structuring a Daubert-compliant report framework, and generating detailed methodology and damages sections. The AI ensures every required element is addressed—from engagement scope to predominance analysis—so your team can focus on refining opinions rather than building documents from scratch.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload the class complaint, damages evidence, and expert CV

  2. 2. AI analyzes the materials and structures a Daubert-compliant expert report

  3. 3. Review and customize the methodology, calculations, and opinion sections

  4. 4. Export the finalized expert report in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Title Page & Case Caption

  • Introduction & Engagement Scope

  • Expert Qualifications

  • Damages Methodology & Analysis

  • Class-Wide Damages Calculation

  • Predominance & Common Issues Analysis

  • Opposing Expert Rebuttal

  • Compliance Checklist

What it handles

  • Generates court-ready expert report structured for Daubert/FRE 702 admissibility

  • Builds class-wide damages methodology analysis with supporting evidence framework

  • Includes expert qualifications section tied directly to chosen methodology

  • Produces predominance analysis supporting FRCP 23(b)(3) certification

  • Auto-generates compliance checklist to verify report completeness before filing

  • Addresses opposing expert methodologies with structured rebuttal framework

Required documents

  • Class Definition & Complaint

    The class action complaint including allegations, liability theories, class definition, and relief sought

    .pdf, .docx

  • Damages Evidence

    Transaction records, financial statements, pricing data, surveys, or defendant-produced databases supporting damages calculations

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx, .csv

  • Expert CV

    The expert's curriculum vitae including credentials, publications, and prior testimony history

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Engagement / Retention Letter

    Letter specifying the opinions requested, scope of engagement, and any exclusions

    .pdf, .docx

  • Opposing Expert Reports

    Reports from opposing experts to distinguish competing methodologies and support rebuttal sections

    .pdf, .docx

  • Legal Authorities & Prior Rulings

    Jurisdiction's Daubert/Frye standard and prior court rulings on the proposed damages methodology

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce expert report drafting time from days to hours with AI-assisted structuring and analysis

Minimize Daubert challenge risk with built-in admissibility compliance checks and methodology validation

Strengthen class certification arguments with rigorous predominance analysis tied to common damages evidence

Streamline collaboration between counsel and damages experts with a structured, editable report framework

Questions

Does this tool produce a report that meets Daubert admissibility standards?

Yes. CaseMark structures every section of the expert report to satisfy Daubert/FRE 702 requirements, including tying expert qualifications to the specific methodology used, documenting reliable principles, and ensuring sufficient factual basis. The built-in compliance checklist helps verify admissibility before filing.

Can I use this for both class certification and trial phases?

Absolutely. CaseMark's expert report workflow is designed for use at class certification, merits, and trial phases. The report addresses both the predominance requirements of FRCP 23(b)(3) and the substantive damages opinions needed at later stages of litigation.

Does the report address opposing expert methodologies?

Yes. If you upload opposing expert reports, CaseMark will generate a structured rebuttal framework that distinguishes competing methodologies and highlights weaknesses in the opposing analysis. This helps strengthen your expert's position during Daubert challenges.

What types of damages evidence should I upload?

CaseMark works with transaction records, financial statements, pricing data, surveys, and defendant-produced databases. The AI will identify the most relevant data points and incorporate them into the damages methodology and calculation sections of the report.

Can I customize the damages methodology used in the report?

Yes. CaseMark presents multiple recognized damages methodologies and allows you to select and customize the primary approach. You can refine assumptions, adjust calculation parameters, and tailor the methodology narrative to match your expert's specific analytical framework.

Does CaseMark handle different jurisdictional admissibility standards?

Yes. CaseMark supports Daubert, Frye, and Sargon admissibility standards. You specify your jurisdiction's standard during setup, and the AI tailors the report's methodology validation and qualification sections accordingly.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours