← All workflows

Prior Art Summary

Summarize Prior Art References in Minutes, Not Hours

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Prior Art Summary

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Prior Art Summary

Overview

CaseMark's Prior Art Summary skill transforms stacks of patent references, publications, and technical documents into structured, citation-rich summaries with claim-element mapping matrices. Designed for patent prosecution, validity analysis, and freedom-to-operate assessments, it delivers the precise analytical framework IP professionals need to make strategic decisions quickly.

Reviewing and summarizing prior art references is one of the most time-intensive tasks in patent practice. Attorneys and patent agents must manually read through dozens of references, extract relevant disclosures, map them to individual claim elements, and identify gaps — all while maintaining precise citation accuracy. This painstaking process creates bottlenecks in prosecution timelines and drives up costs for clients.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of prior art analysis by reading your references and invention claims, then generating structured summaries with precise citations, claim-element mapping matrices, and combination analysis. The result is a comprehensive, ready-to-use analytical framework that lets IP professionals focus on strategy rather than document review.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your prior art references and invention claims or specification

  2. 2. Select your analysis scope — prosecution, validity/invalidity, or freedom-to-operate

  3. 3. AI analyzes each reference, extracts key disclosures, and maps them to claim elements with precise citations

  4. 4. Review the structured summary, claim mapping matrix, and combination analysis, then export in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Executive Overview

  • Individual Reference Summaries

  • Claim-Element Mapping Matrix

  • Combination Analysis

  • Chronological Timeline

What it handles

  • Executive overview with material reference rankings and gap identification

  • Structured individual reference summaries with precise citations and quoted language

  • Claim-element mapping matrix with full, partial, and absent disclosure indicators

  • Combination analysis with motivation-to-combine rationale and missing element tracking

  • Chronological timeline with critical date boundaries for prior art qualification

  • Art type breakdown across patents, applications, publications, and other disclosures

Required documents

  • Prior Art References

    Patents, published applications, academic publications, product documentation, or other prior art references to be analyzed

    .pdf, .docx

  • Invention Description

    Patent claims, specification, or invention disclosure describing the technology under analysis

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Office Action or Examiner Correspondence

    Any office actions or examiner search reports citing the prior art references

    .pdf, .docx

  • Claim Charts or Previous Analysis

    Existing claim charts or prior art analysis to build upon or cross-reference

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

Why teams use it

Reduce prior art review time from days to minutes with AI-generated structured summaries and claim-element mapping

Never miss a critical disclosure with systematic element-by-element analysis across all references with precise citations

Strengthen prosecution arguments with automated gap identification and combination obviousness analysis

Maintain consistent, high-quality work product across your entire patent portfolio with standardized summary formats

Questions

What types of prior art references can CaseMark analyze?

CaseMark can process patents, published patent applications, academic publications, product documentation, and other public disclosures. The AI extracts and structures relevant technical disclosures regardless of the source format.

How does the claim-element mapping work?

CaseMark's AI breaks down your claims into individual elements and systematically maps each element against every prior art reference. Each mapping includes precise citations (paragraph numbers, column:line references, page numbers, and figure references) with indicators for full, partial, or absent disclosure.

Can I use this for office action responses?

Absolutely. CaseMark's prior art summaries are specifically designed to support office action responses by identifying gaps in cited references, highlighting distinguishing features of your invention, and providing the precise citation framework you need to draft persuasive arguments.

How does CaseMark handle combination obviousness analysis?

CaseMark identifies potentially obvious reference combinations and evaluates each by analyzing analogous art rationale, explicit suggestions to combine, and design incentives. It also flags elements that remain undisclosed even after combination, helping you build stronger non-obviousness arguments.

How accurate are the citations and quoted language?

CaseMark extracts exact quoted language from your uploaded references and provides precise citation locations including paragraph numbers, column:line references, page numbers, and figure callouts. We always recommend verifying citations against the original documents before filing.

Can this be used for freedom-to-operate assessments?

Yes. By selecting the FTO scope directive, CaseMark tailors its analysis to focus on active patent claims that may cover your product or process, mapping your features against claim elements to identify potential infringement risks and design-around opportunities.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

30b6 Deposition

Draft & Defend 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours