← All workflows

Strategy Summary

Build a Litigation Strategy Roadmap in Minutes

12 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

12 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

  • Pleadings and Draft Claims
  • Key Exhibits and Correspondence
  • Client Objectives Memo

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's Litigation Strategy Summary skill transforms your case documents, client objectives, and procedural context into a comprehensive, structured litigation roadmap. The AI synthesizes facts, legal authority, procedural tactics, discovery plans, and settlement posture into a single actionable document that aligns your entire legal team around a unified strategy.

Building a comprehensive litigation strategy requires synthesizing vast amounts of information — pleadings, evidence, legal research, procedural rules, and client objectives — into a coherent plan. This process traditionally consumes hours of senior attorney time, and critical risks or gaps can be missed when information is scattered across multiple documents and team members.

CaseMark's AI-powered strategy summary ingests your case documents and objectives, then systematically maps facts to claims, identifies evidentiary gaps, charts procedural and discovery tactics, and assesses risk-weighted outcomes. The result is a polished, structured roadmap that would take hours to produce manually, delivered in minutes and ready for team review and client presentation.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your pleadings, exhibits, correspondence, and client objectives

  2. 2. AI synthesizes facts, legal issues, and procedural context into a unified strategy

  3. 3. Review the structured roadmap covering arguments, discovery, motions, and settlement

  4. 4. Export the finalized strategy summary in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Executive Overview

  • Key Facts Chronology

  • Issues, Claims & Defenses Analysis

  • Legal Authority Snapshot

  • Argument Map with Counters & Rebuttals

  • Procedural Strategy & Motions Plan

  • Discovery Strategy & Checklist

  • Settlement / ADR Posture

  • Risk and Outcome Assessment

What it handles

  • Executive overview with strategic thesis and top risks

  • Structured fact chronology with source attribution

  • Claims, defenses, and element-by-element gap analysis

  • Argument mapping with anticipated counters and rebuttals

  • Discovery and procedural strategy with success likelihood ratings

  • Settlement posture and risk-weighted outcome scenarios

Required documents

  • Pleadings and Draft Claims

    Complaints, answers, counterclaims, or draft claims that define the legal issues in the case

    .pdf, .docx

  • Key Exhibits and Correspondence

    Critical evidence, contracts, communications, and supporting documents relevant to the dispute

    .pdf, .docx, .eml, .msg

  • Client Objectives Memo

    Document outlining client goals, acceptable outcomes, constraints, and settlement posture

    .pdf, .docx, .txt

Supporting documents

  • Scheduling Orders and Deadlines

    Court scheduling orders, limitations periods, and upcoming filing deadlines

    .pdf, .docx

  • Prior Legal Research or Memos

    Existing research memos, case law summaries, or prior strategy notes to inform the analysis

    .pdf, .docx

  • Discovery Documents

    Existing discovery requests, responses, deposition transcripts, or document inventories

    .pdf, .docx, .xlsx

Why teams use it

Reduce strategic planning time from days to minutes while maintaining analytical rigor

Ensure no critical issue, gap, or risk is overlooked with systematic element-by-element analysis

Align stakeholders around a single source of truth with a clear executive overview and decision framework

Strengthen case positioning with structured argument mapping that anticipates opposing counters and prepares rebuttals

Questions

What types of cases does this strategy summary support?

CaseMark's litigation strategy summary works across all civil litigation matters, including commercial disputes, employment claims, IP litigation, and tort cases. The AI adapts its analysis to the specific facts, jurisdiction, and procedural posture you provide.

How does the AI identify risks and gaps in my case?

CaseMark analyzes your uploaded documents to map each claim element against available evidence, flagging unsupported elements, disputed facts, and missing documents. The risk assessment section provides probability-weighted outcome scenarios so you can prioritize resources effectively.

Can I use this for settlement negotiations?

Absolutely. The strategy summary includes a dedicated Settlement/ADR Posture section that evaluates timing, leverage points, risks, and recommendations for each resolution pathway, giving you a data-driven foundation for negotiation strategy.

How does this differ from a simple case summary?

While a case summary recaps facts and procedural history, CaseMark's strategy summary is an actionable roadmap. It includes argument mapping with anticipated counters, a motions plan with success likelihood ratings, a prioritized discovery strategy, and outcome scenarios — everything needed for strategic decision-making.

Is my case data secure when using CaseMark?

CaseMark employs enterprise-grade encryption, strict access controls, and SOC 2-compliant infrastructure. Your documents and strategy outputs are never used to train AI models, ensuring complete confidentiality of your litigation strategy.

How long does it take to generate a full strategy summary?

CaseMark typically produces a comprehensive litigation strategy summary in approximately 10-15 minutes, depending on the volume of uploaded documents. This replaces what traditionally takes senior attorneys many hours or even days to compile manually.

Related

30b6 Corporate Rep

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

30b6 Deposition

Master 30(b)(6) Depositions in Minutes, Not Hours

Abstract of Judgment

Draft Judgment Abstracts in Minutes, Not Hours