← All workflows

Summary Judgment Brief

Draft Summary Judgment Briefs in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Summary Judgment Brief

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Summary Judgment Brief

Overview

CaseMark's Summary Judgment Brief skill drafts comprehensive FRCP 56 dispositive motions by synthesizing your discovery record with controlling legal authority. It produces a structured brief with numbered undisputed material facts, element-by-element legal argument, and proper burden-shifting analysis — transforming what typically takes days of drafting into a polished first draft in minutes.

Drafting a summary judgment brief is one of the most labor-intensive tasks in commercial litigation. Attorneys must manually sift through voluminous discovery records, map each material fact to specific record citations, and weave evidence through element-by-element legal analysis — a process that routinely consumes 20-40 hours of attorney time per motion.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of MSJ brief drafting by ingesting your discovery record and controlling authority, then producing a structured brief with numbered undisputed facts, precise record citations, and element-by-element argument. The result is a comprehensive first draft that lets attorneys focus on strategy and refinement rather than document assembly.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your discovery record, controlling authority, and identify the targeted claims or defenses

  2. 2. AI synthesizes evidence and case law to construct a structured MSJ brief with numbered undisputed facts

  3. 3. Review the element-by-element argument, verify record citations, and customize the analysis

  4. 4. Export the polished brief in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF) ready for filing

What you get

  • Caption and Introduction

  • Statement of Undisputed Material Facts

  • Legal Standard

  • Element-by-Element Argument

  • Burden-Shifting Analysis

  • Conclusion and Prayer for Relief

What it handles

  • Structured Statement of Undisputed Material Facts with record citations

  • Legal standard section incorporating Celotex/Anderson/Matsushita framework

  • Element-by-element argument mapping evidence to each legal requirement

  • Automatic organization of discovery evidence by claim or defense

  • Caption and formatting aligned to local rule requirements

  • Burden-shifting analysis for both movant and non-movant positions

Required documents

  • Discovery Record

    Deposition transcripts, interrogatory answers, requests for admission responses, and document production exhibits that support the motion

    .pdf, .docx

  • Controlling Authority

    Key case law, statutes, and binding precedent on the substantive legal elements and summary judgment standard

    .pdf, .docx

  • Complaint or Operative Pleading

    The complaint, counterclaim, or answer identifying the specific claims and defenses targeted by the motion

    .pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

  • Local Rules or Standing Orders

    Court-specific rules regarding page limits, separate statement requirements, and motion formatting

    .pdf, .docx

  • Prior Court Orders

    Relevant scheduling orders, discovery rulings, or prior dispositive motion decisions in the case

    .pdf, .docx

  • Expert Reports

    Expert declarations or reports supporting or relevant to the undisputed material facts

    .pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce MSJ drafting time from days to minutes with AI-powered evidence synthesis

Ensure every undisputed fact is properly tied to admissible record evidence with specific citations

Organize arguments element-by-element so no legal requirement is overlooked

Maintain consistency with the Celotex/Anderson/Matsushita framework across all dispositive motions

Questions

What types of summary judgment motions can this handle?

CaseMark supports full summary judgment motions, partial summary judgment on specific claims or defenses, and cross-motions for summary judgment in U.S. commercial litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalents.

Does the AI properly cite to the discovery record?

Yes. CaseMark maps each undisputed material fact to specific record evidence you provide — deposition page:line references, declaration paragraphs, RFA admissions, and exhibit numbers. You should always verify citations before filing.

Can it handle both plaintiff and defendant MSJ briefs?

Absolutely. CaseMark adjusts the burden-of-proof framework depending on whether you are the movant proving all elements are undisputed or a defendant negating a specific element under the Celotex framework.

Does it incorporate the correct legal standard and case law?

CaseMark structures the legal standard section around the foundational FRCP 56 trilogy — Celotex, Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, and Matsushita — and integrates the controlling authority you provide for the substantive legal elements at issue.

How does it handle local rule requirements like separate statements of fact?

CaseMark generates a numbered Statement of Undisputed Material Facts that can be used as a standalone separate statement where required by local rules. You should review formatting against your specific court's requirements.

Is the output ready to file as-is?

CaseMark produces a comprehensive, well-structured draft that significantly accelerates your workflow. However, as with any AI-generated legal document, attorney review, verification of citations, and customization to your specific case strategy are essential before filing.

Related