Summary Judgment Brief

Draft Summary Judgment Briefs in Minutes, Not Hours

14 minutes with CaseMark

Run this workflow

Run it in CaseMark

Upload your documents and get a finished work product in minutes. New accounts get $5 free to run their first skill.

14 minutes with CaseMark

What you'll need

Discovery Record
Controlling Authority
Complaint or Operative Pleading

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA compliant · $5 free credit

Workflow

Overview

CaseMark's Summary Judgment Brief skill drafts comprehensive FRCP 56 dispositive motions by synthesizing your discovery record with controlling legal authority. It produces a structured brief with numbered undisputed material facts, element-by-element legal argument, and proper burden-shifting analysis — transforming what typically takes days of drafting into a polished first draft in minutes.

Drafting a summary judgment brief is one of the most labor-intensive tasks in commercial litigation. Attorneys must manually sift through voluminous discovery records, map each material fact to specific record citations, and weave evidence through element-by-element legal analysis — a process that routinely consumes 20-40 hours of attorney time per motion.

CaseMark automates the heavy lifting of MSJ brief drafting by ingesting your discovery record and controlling authority, then producing a structured brief with numbered undisputed facts, precise record citations, and element-by-element argument. The result is a comprehensive first draft that lets attorneys focus on strategy and refinement rather than document assembly.

How it works

1. Upload your discovery record, controlling authority, and identify the targeted claims or defenses
2. AI synthesizes evidence and case law to construct a structured MSJ brief with numbered undisputed facts
3. Review the element-by-element argument, verify record citations, and customize the analysis
4. Export the polished brief in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF) ready for filing

What you get

Caption and Introduction
Statement of Undisputed Material Facts
Legal Standard
Element-by-Element Argument
Burden-Shifting Analysis
Conclusion and Prayer for Relief

What it handles

Structured Statement of Undisputed Material Facts with record citations
Legal standard section incorporating Celotex/Anderson/Matsushita framework
Element-by-element argument mapping evidence to each legal requirement
Automatic organization of discovery evidence by claim or defense
Caption and formatting aligned to local rule requirements
Burden-shifting analysis for both movant and non-movant positions

Required documents

Discovery Record
Deposition transcripts, interrogatory answers, requests for admission responses, and document production exhibits that support the motion
.pdf, .docx
Controlling Authority
Key case law, statutes, and binding precedent on the substantive legal elements and summary judgment standard
.pdf, .docx
Complaint or Operative Pleading
The complaint, counterclaim, or answer identifying the specific claims and defenses targeted by the motion
.pdf, .docx

Supporting documents

Local Rules or Standing Orders
Court-specific rules regarding page limits, separate statement requirements, and motion formatting
.pdf, .docx
Prior Court Orders
Relevant scheduling orders, discovery rulings, or prior dispositive motion decisions in the case
.pdf, .docx
Expert Reports
Expert declarations or reports supporting or relevant to the undisputed material facts
.pdf, .docx

Why teams use it

Reduce MSJ drafting time from days to minutes with AI-powered evidence synthesis

Ensure every undisputed fact is properly tied to admissible record evidence with specific citations

Organize arguments element-by-element so no legal requirement is overlooked

Maintain consistency with the Celotex/Anderson/Matsushita framework across all dispositive motions

Questions

What types of summary judgment motions can this handle?

CaseMark supports full summary judgment motions, partial summary judgment on specific claims or defenses, and cross-motions for summary judgment in U.S. commercial litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalents.

Does the AI properly cite to the discovery record?

Yes. CaseMark maps each undisputed material fact to specific record evidence you provide — deposition page:line references, declaration paragraphs, RFA admissions, and exhibit numbers. You should always verify citations before filing.

Can it handle both plaintiff and defendant MSJ briefs?

Absolutely. CaseMark adjusts the burden-of-proof framework depending on whether you are the movant proving all elements are undisputed or a defendant negating a specific element under the Celotex framework.

Does it incorporate the correct legal standard and case law?

CaseMark structures the legal standard section around the foundational FRCP 56 trilogy — Celotex, Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, and Matsushita — and integrates the controlling authority you provide for the substantive legal elements at issue.

How does it handle local rule requirements like separate statements of fact?

CaseMark generates a numbered Statement of Undisputed Material Facts that can be used as a standalone separate statement where required by local rules. You should review formatting against your specific court's requirements.

Is the output ready to file as-is?

CaseMark produces a comprehensive, well-structured draft that significantly accelerates your workflow. However, as with any AI-generated legal document, attorney review, verification of citations, and customization to your specific case strategy are essential before filing.